New research reveals that readers not only failed to distinguish between short stories written by published human authors and those generated by ChatGPT, but consistently gave higher ratings to the AI-generated content. The study compared three human-written stories with three AI-generated ones.
A study published by Cambridge University Press found that readers rated short stories generated by ChatGPT higher than those written by published human authors, with participants often unable to distinguish between AI and human-written content. The research examined responses from people aged 18 to 81 comparing three human-authored stories with three AI-generated ones.
LinkedIn introduced new ways to reduce AI-generated posts, including a 'seems like AI slop' reporting option, and replaced its AI writing feature with a proofreading tool. Snapchat also announced it will no longer recommend or reward fully AI-generated videos in Spotlight.
