The Trump administration has suffered 21 consecutive federal court defeats in its aggressive campaign to force 30 states and Washington, D.C. to hand over unredacted voter registration rolls. Judges appointed by both political parties have consistently ruled that the U.S. Constitution grants states primary authority over elections. Despite these setbacks, the Justice Department continues to pursue appeals and has paired its lawsuits with threats to withhold federal disaster relief funds from non-compliant states.
Trump administration voter roll lawsuits
- ▪The Trump administration's Justice Department has filed lawsuits against 30 states and the District of Columbia seeking unredacted statewide voter registration lists.
- ▪The Trump administration has suffered 21 consecutive federal court defeats since January 2026 in its legal campaign to obtain state voter rolls.
- ▪The Justice Department has appealed 16 of its courtroom losses, including an appeal to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals which upheld the dismissal of the lawsuit against Michigan.
Noncitizen voting claims
- ▪President Donald Trump argues that widespread noncitizen voting is occurring in large numbers and benefits the Democratic Party.
- ▪The Department of Homeland Security claimed on July 17, 2026, that more than 250,000 potential noncitizens were registered to vote in four states, though DHS did not verify how many were actually noncitizens.
- ▪A Reuters investigation found that only 129 people have been prosecuted for noncitizen voting since the practice was criminalized in 1996, with most cases stemming from voter confusion.
Federal court rejections
- ▪U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon denied the administration's bid for Pennsylvania's voter list on June 27, 2026, characterizing the effort as a "fishing expedition" to advance unsubstantiated claims.
- ▪U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss dismissed the Justice Department's bid to obtain unredacted voter rolls from Washington, D.C. on August 6, 2026.
- ▪Federal judges appointed by presidents of both political parties, including seven district judges appointed by Donald Trump, have rejected the Justice Department's lawsuits.
Justice Department legal strategy
- ▪The Trump administration has paired its lawsuits with threats by the Department of Homeland Security to withhold disaster relief funds from states that do not screen voter rolls through the federal SAVE database.
- ▪The Justice Department has filed "Notice of Additional Basis" documents in Minnesota and New Jersey to leverage local, state-specific voting incidents without changing its underlying legal theory.
- ▪The Justice Department has maintained a consistent legal theory based on Title III of the Civil Rights Act of 1960, arguing the statute gives the federal government authority to demand state voter databases.
- ▪Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon sent letters to election officials in all 50 states in early July 2026, warning of potential criminal charges if they knowingly allow noncitizens on voter rolls.
State election authority
- ▪Courts have rejected the Justice Department's interpretation of Title III of the Civil Rights Act of 1960, ruling that constantly changing state-created databases do not qualify as records that "come into" officials' possession.
- ▪Federal courts have repeatedly ruled that the U.S. Constitution assigns primary responsibility for administering elections to individual states rather than the federal government.
Story comments
Loading comments…