Geo News
Community curated by people like you
LatestAICryptoHealthWorld AffairsUS Politics
Luke Dashjr removed as Bitcoin BIP editor after BIP-110 fork fails
00

Luke Dashjr removed as Bitcoin BIP editor after BIP-110 fork fails

Aug 11, 2026

Bitcoin developer Luke Dashjr has been removed as a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) editor following the failure of the controversial BIP-110 soft fork. Fellow editor Mark Erhardt filed the motion on August 9, 2026, accusing Dashjr of abusing his editorial authority to fast-track the proposal, which sought to restrict arbitrary data like Ordinals. The BIP-110 fork triggered a chain split on August 8 but stalled after mining only two blocks, securing just 2.53% miner support against a 55% threshold. Dashjr, who called his removal an abuse of power, has taken a sabbatical from mining pool Ocean.

Luke Dashjr BIP editor removal

  • ▪Luke Dashjr described his removal as an editor as an abuse of power by Bitcoin Core and asserted they had no authority to do so.
  • ▪Bitcoin developer Luke Dashjr was removed from his position as an editor of Bitcoin Improvement Proposals on August 10, 2026.
  • ▪Bitcoin developer Jon Atack merged pull request #2248 to delete Luke Dashjr's name from BIP 3, the document listing active BIP editors.

BIP-110 soft fork failure

  • ▪Michael Saylor and Blockstream's Adam Back publicly opposed BIP-110, objecting to an activation method they argued invited a chain split.
  • ▪The BIP-110 proposal sought to temporarily restrict the amount of arbitrary, non-financial data, such as Ordinals inscriptions, embedded in Bitcoin transactions.
  • ▪BIP-110 failed to activate after receiving signaling support from only 51 of 2,016 blocks, representing 2.53% of miners, far below the required 55% threshold.

Chain split stalled blocks

  • ▪The BIP-110 breakaway chain stalled at block height 961,633 after a pseudonymous mining group called Roughnecks mined only two blocks.
  • ▪The BIP-110 soft fork attempt triggered a minority chain split at block 961,632 on August 8, 2026, when enforcing nodes rejected blocks that did not signal support.
  • ▪By August 10, 2026, the main Bitcoin chain had advanced to block 961,925, leaving the stalled BIP-110 fork 292 blocks behind.

Editorial misconduct allegations

  • ▪Mark Erhardt alleged that Luke Dashjr attempted to assign a BIP number to BIP-110 before mailing-list discussion and quickly merged an update within minutes of its pull request opening.
  • ▪Bitcoin developer Mark Erhardt filed the motion to remove Luke Dashjr on August 9, 2026, alleging Dashjr unfairly favored BIP-110 by bypassing established editorial processes.
  • ▪Mark Erhardt noted that Luke Dashjr contributed fewer than 1% of BIP editor comments since April 2024, and the disputed BIP-110 merge was his first since May 2024.

Ocean mining pool sabbatical

  • ▪Luke Dashjr announced on August 10, 2026, that he is taking a sabbatical from his roles as chairman and chief technology officer of mining pool Ocean.
  • ▪Ocean, which was the only mining pool to signal support for BIP-110, announced it would reimburse miners whose hashrate was inadvertently directed to the stalled fork.

6 sources

Decrypt
Luke Dashjr Removed as BIP Editor After BIP-110 Bitcoin Fork Stalls - Decrypt
View source article
Bitcoinmagazine
BIP-110 Fork Stalls At Two Blocks As Bitcoin Miners Refuse To Follow
View source article
Cointelegraph
Luke Dashjr Removed as Bitcoin Improvement Proposal Editor
View source article
Thedefiant
Bitcoin's BIP Editors Remove Luke Dashjr Two Days After BIP-110 Fork Stalled
View source article
Cryptobriefing
Murch calls for Luke Dashjr's removal from Bitcoin BIP Editors after BIP-110 controversy
View source article

Featured stories

Bitcoin BIP-110 fork stalls after mining only two blocks

Aug 9, 2026 · 5 sources

Story comments

Loading comments…

People Involved

Luke Dashjr

Topics

Bitcoin protocol & upgradesBitcoin miningBitcoin governance

Featured stories

Bitcoin BIP-110 fork stalls after mining only two blocks

Aug 9, 2026 · 5 sources