Hong Kong convicts Tiananmen vigil organizers of inciting subversion
Chow Hang-tung and Lee Cheuk-yan were found guilty of inciting subversion at West Kowloon Court on August 21, 2026, facing up to 10 years jail under a national security law imposed by Beijing in 2020. The pair led the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, which organized annual Tiananmen remembrance vigils until 2019. Both have been held in pre-trial custody since late 2021.
Subversion conviction verdict
▪Lee Cheuk-yan formed a heart with his arms after the guilty verdict was handed down on August 21, 2026
▪Albert Ho had previously pleaded guilty to inciting subversion and will be sentenced later
▪The judges ruled that the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China's leaders had been actively advocating and performing activities that intended to overthrow and undermine the Chinese Communist Party
▪Chow Hang-tung was found guilty of inciting subversion at West Kowloon Court on August 21, 2026
▪Chow Hang-tung blew supporters in the public gallery a kiss after the guilty verdict was handed down on August 21, 2026
▪The judges ruled that the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China's agenda breached the Chinese constitution and was unlawful despite the absence of any use or threat of violence
▪Chow Hang-tung and Lee Cheuk-yan face a jail term of up to 10 years under a national security law imposed on Hong Kong by Beijing in 2020
Tiananmen vigil tradition
▪Following the events of 1989, mourners would converge on June 4 every year in Hong Kong's Causeway Bay district to attend a vigil that filled multiple soccer pitches in Victoria Park with candlelight
▪Hong Kong's annual candlelight Tiananmen vigil used to draw huge crowds calling for full democracy for Hong Kong and an end to one-party rule in China
▪The Hong Kong Tiananmen vigil tradition continued after Hong Kong's 1997 handover by Britain to China
▪The Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China was responsible for organizing the annual Tiananmen remembrance until 2019
▪Chinese troops cracked down on pro-democracy protesters around Beijing's Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989
National security crackdown
▪The Hong Kong national security crackdown followed huge and often violent democracy protests that convulsed Hong Kong in 2019
▪Beijing imposed a national security law on Hong Kong in 2020
▪The Hong Kong Tiananmen vigil tradition came to an end with the imposition of a series of new national security offenses following the 2019 protests
▪Pre-trial custody has become commonplace for national security arrests in Hong Kong, where bail is harder to achieve
Trial defense arguments
▪Prosecutors argued that the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China incited subversion by calling for an end to one-party dictatorship
▪The defense denied the suggestion that the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China meant to topple the Chinese Communist Party
▪The defense argued that the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China's campaign was about moving toward democracy and urging the Chinese Communist Party not to enforce a dictatorship
▪Prosecutors argued that the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China's calls were aimed at unlawfully trying to topple China's fundamental system and central political bodies
▪The defense argued that the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China had not asked people to adopt any illegal means and promoted peaceful protest
Convicted activists' backgrounds
▪Chow Hang-tung is a human rights lawyer who conducted her own defense in the inciting subversion trial
▪Chow Hang-tung, Lee Cheuk-yan, and Albert Ho were key leaders of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China
▪Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung have been kept in pre-trial custody since their arrest in late 2021
▪Lee Cheuk-yan is a former opposition lawmaker in Hong Kong
Perspective of Prosecutors
▪Prosecutors argued that the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China's calls were aimed at unlawfully trying to topple China's fundamental system and central political bodies
▪Prosecutors argued that the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China incited subversion by calling for an end to one-party dictatorship
Perspective of Defense
▪The defense argued that the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China's campaign was about moving toward democracy and urging the Chinese Communist Party not to enforce a dictatorship
▪The defense argued that the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China had not asked people to adopt any illegal means and promoted peaceful protest
Story comments
Loading comments…