Quarter-million Uber drivers launch European class action over AI algorithm

On September 2, 2026, Worker Info Exchange International filed a landmark class action lawsuit against Uber at the Amsterdam District Court on behalf of 240,000 European drivers. The lawsuit alleges that Uber's AI-powered dynamic pricing algorithm violates GDPR by using automated profiling to systematically lower driver pay. While drivers report significant annual income losses, Uber categorically rejects the claims, asserting that fares are based on real-time trip data rather than individual driver behavior.

European class action lawsuit

• ▪A separate class action lawsuit, Carranza v. Uber Technologies, was filed in California on July 9, 2026, alleging that Uber uses driver behavioral data to generate lower pay offers.
• ▪The European Trade Union Confederation stated that the collective legal action filed against Uber in Amsterdam is the first collective legal move of its kind.
• ▪Worker Info Exchange International filed a collective legal action at the Amsterdam District Court on September 2, 2026, representing approximately 240,000 Uber drivers across Europe.

AI algorithm dynamic pricing

• ▪Uber shifted from a fixed pricing model, where drivers typically paid a flat commission rate of approximately 25%, to dynamic pay systems starting around 2020.
• ▪Uber drivers reported that the algorithm has offered the same job to different drivers at different pay rates, such as offering one driver £27 and another £23.
• ▪Uber's AI-powered Upfront Pricing algorithm sets personalized rates for each ride by evaluating a driver's acceptance history, behavioral profile, and other personal data points.

Driver earnings decline

• ▪Legal filings estimate that cumulative losses for individual UK Uber drivers could reach up to £26,239 from August 2021 through June 2026 due to pricing changes.
• ▪A June 2025 study by the University of Oxford and Worker Info Exchange found substantial cuts in driver earnings after Uber introduced its dynamic pricing algorithm.
• ▪The lawsuit alleges that Uber's dynamic pay-setting algorithm has pushed down UK drivers' annual incomes by an estimated average of £5,000 to £5,337 since 2023.

GDPR violations alleged

• ▪The lawsuit alleges that Uber unlawfully transferred driver data to the United States and used driver data without authorization to train its AI models.
• ▪The Dutch data protection authority fined Uber €825 million in August 2026 for deactivating driver accounts through automated systems without adequate notice.
• ▪The lawsuit alleges that Uber violated the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation by using automated decision-making and profiling to set pay without drivers' consent.

Uber pricing defense

• ▪Uber categorically rejected the lawsuit's allegations, stating that the Uber app does not adjust trip prices based on individual driver behavior or trip acceptance history.
• ▪An Uber spokesperson stated that the app calculates fares using real-time trip information such as journey duration and destination, and that drivers see earnings before accepting trips.

Debatable claims

• ▪Uber's automated pay-setting violates European data protection laws
• ▪Gig platforms should be barred from training AI on worker behavioral data
• ▪Uber's dynamic pricing algorithm unfairly suppresses driver pay

2 sources