Nevada Judge Extends Ban on Kalshi Sports Betting Markets, Ruling Contracts 'Indistinguishable' from Gambling

Apr 5, 2026

Nevada state court Judge Jason Woodbury extended a temporary restraining order against Kalshi on April 4, 2026, ruling the prediction market platform's baseball game contracts are indistinguishable from gambling and require a gaming license. The decision makes Nevada the only state with an active court-enforced ban against Kalshi, though Arizona filed 20 criminal misdemeanor counts in March 2026 and judges in Ohio and Maryland have also ruled against the platform. The CFTC sued Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois on April 3 to assert exclusive federal jurisdiction over prediction markets, with Chairman Michael Selig accusing states of creating fragmented regulation. The legal battle involves Kalshi, valued at $22 billion with $10.4 billion in February trading volume, and analysts predict the dispute will reach the Supreme Court with resolution potentially not arriving until 2028.

Nevada court ruling against Kalshi's sports betting contracts

▪Nevada is the only state with an active, court-enforced ban against Kalshi as of April 4, 2026.
▪Nevada state court Judge Jason Woodbury of the First Judicial District Court in Carson City said on Friday April 4, 2026 that he would grant a preliminary injunction barring Kalshi from offering sports, entertainment, and election-related contracts in Nevada without a gaming license.
▪Judge Jason Woodbury extended a temporary restraining order against Kalshi that he first granted on March 20, 2026 by two weeks while finalizing the injunction's language.

Broader multi-state legal battles over prediction market regulation

▪U.S. District Judge Michael Liburdi heard arguments on April 4, 2026 in federal court in Arizona on Kalshi's motion to halt Arizona's criminal prosecution of the platform.
▪A Tennessee federal judge sided with Kalshi in February 2026, finding the platform is likely to succeed in arguing its contracts qualify as federally regulated swaps.
▪Senators Adam Schiff and John Curtis introduced a bipartisan Senate bill in March 2026 that would prohibit CFTC-regulated platforms from listing sports and casino-style betting contracts.
▪Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes filed 20 misdemeanor counts against Kalshi in March 2026 for allegedly accepting unlicensed wagers on sports and elections.
▪TD Cowen said the prediction market dispute is likely headed to the Supreme Court, with a resolution potentially not arriving until 2028.

Kalshi's commercial growth amid regulatory challenges

▪Kalshi has been valued at roughly $22 billion following a $1 billion fundraising round disclosed in March 2026.
▪Kalshi has signed distribution partnerships with Robinhood, CNN, CNBC, and Google Finance.
▪Kalshi recorded about $10.4 billion in trading volume in February 2026.

Perspective of Kalshi

▪Kalshi raised $1 billion in a fundraising round that valued the prediction market platform at roughly $22 billion in March 2026.
▪Kalshi has secured distribution partnerships with major platforms including Robinhood, CNN, CNBC, and Google Finance to expand its prediction market offerings.

Perspective of CFTC

▪CFTC Chairman Michael Selig accused Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois of trying to impose a fragmented patchwork of state regulations on prediction markets.
▪The CFTC sued Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois on April 3, 2026 to assert federal jurisdiction over prediction markets and block state enforcement actions.

Perspective of State regulators (Nevada, Arizona)

▪Nevada Judge Jason Woodbury ruled that buying a contract on a baseball game through Kalshi was indistinguishable from placing a bet on a state-licensed gaming platform.
▪Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes filed 20 misdemeanor counts against Kalshi in March 2026 for allegedly accepting unlicensed wagers on sports and elections.
▪Arizona became the first state to file criminal charges against a prediction market platform when it charged Kalshi in March 2026.