A federal judge denied a request from 26 states to postpone new Medicaid work requirements, allowing the policy to proceed toward a Jan. 1 implementation. The rules, part of a Trump-era law, have sparked confusion over narrowed criteria for "medically frail" exemptions. States argue they lack the capacity for the rollout, while advocates fear millions of vulnerable people could lose coverage due to new bureaucratic hurdles and strict documentation demands.
Medicaid work requirements rollout
- ▪The new rules are scheduled to go into effect in many states on January 1, with some states like Nebraska, Arkansas, Montana, and Iowa planning to launch earlier
- ▪On July 30, 2026, U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns of Massachusetts denied a request from 26 states for a preliminary injunction to postpone Medicaid work requirements
- ▪The work requirements were created to help pay for President Trump’s tax cut law, H.R. 1, passed a year prior
Medical frailty exemption criteria
- ▪To be exempt as "medically frail," beneficiaries must prove their sickness causes "functional impairments" that prevent them from working 20 hours per week
- ▪Starting in 2028, claims for medical frailty exemption must be supported by health data, though enrollees can self-attest for the first year
- ▪Conditions like well-controlled HIV/AIDS, asthma, hypertension, diabetes, and ADHD are not typically expected to qualify for a medical frailty exemption
Administrative burden on patients
- ▪The ultimate burden of proving medical frailty will likely fall on Medicaid patients and their doctors due to data limitations
- ▪In Nebraska, some Medicaid recipients have been unable to determine if the new rules apply to them and have received incorrect information from state caseworkers
- ▪Many chronically ill people are already burdened by paperwork, insurance appeals, and follow-ups required to get a diagnosis or proper treatment
Implementation challenges for states
- ▪Building a system to vet medical frailty applications in under six months will be a significant challenge for states
- ▪The states' lawsuit argues that the final rule from CMS violates the Administrative Procedure Act and differs from previous guidance
- ▪After Arkansas imposed similar requirements in 2018, many people who should have been exempt were kicked off the rolls
Coverage loss risks
- ▪Preliminary estimates from the Congressional Budget Office suggest over 7 million people will lose Medicaid coverage in the coming years due to the new rules
- ▪A recent study found that roughly half of low-income adults on Medicaid with serious health impairments would be at risk of disenrollment
Story comments
Loading comments…